KEKUATAN EKSEKUSI PUTUSAN PENGADILAN AGAMA DI INDONESIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47945/muadalah.v6i1.3282Keywords:
Execution Power, Sorong Religious Court, Structural Incompatibility, Maqāṣid al-Sharī'ah, Comparative LawAbstract
This study examines the execution power of Religious Court decisions in Indonesia through normative legal research with comparative analysis. Despite significant jurisdictional expansion through three legislative amendments, a persistent structural gap exists between the court's adjudicative authority and its enforcement capacity. Analysis of HIR, RBg, Law No. 7/1989 as amended, and the Compilation of Islamic Law reveals that the execution framework relies on voluntary compliance due to the application of colonial procedural law designed for tangible property execution, creating structural incompatibility with Islamic family rights such as nafkah and hadhanah. This research recommends systemic reconstruction through amendments to the Religious Courts Law, establishment of a national maintenance collection agency inspired by the Dutch LBIO model, direct withholding mechanisms based on the Australian model, status-based sanctions adopting US and Canadian practices, and transformation of judicial decisions toward self-executing judgments. This reconstruction is formulated while respecting maqāṣid al-sharī'ah principles that place protection of lineage and property as fundamental objectives.
References
Australia, Services. “Deductions under a section 72A (garnishee) notice.” Preprint, Australian Government, 2025.
Canada, Justice. Licence Suspension and Denial: Overview of a New Mechanism for Enforcing Child Support. Department of Justice Canada, 2001.
Development, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and. PF1.5 Child Maintenance (Child Support). OECD Family Database, 2024.
Hadrian, Endang, dan Lukman Hakim. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia: Permasalahan Eksekusi dan Mediasi. Deepublish, 2020.
Harahap, M. Yahya. Ruang Lingkup Permasalahan Eksekusi Bidang Perdata. Edisi 2. Sinar Grafika, 2005.
Haris, Ahmad, Edy Lisdiyono, dan Setiyowati. “The Reconstruction of Religious Court Decision Execution on the Fulfilment of Children’s Rights Post-Divorce in Indonesia.” Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental 18, no. 7 (2024). https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n7-035.
Herzien Inlandsch Reglement (HIR) / Reglemen Indonesia yang Diperbarui (RIB) (1941).
Manan, Abdul. Pengadilan Agama: Cagar Budaya Nusantara Memperkuat NKRI. Kencana, 2019.
Marilin, Eka Irwan, Akiruddin Ahmad, dan Sahbudi. “Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Eksekusi Putusan Kewajiban Pemberian Nafkah Anak di Bawah Umur Akibat Perceraian Orang Tua (Studi Pengadilan Agama Medan).” Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum 12, no. 2 (2025): 245–54. https://doi.org/10.31289/jiph.v12i2.16145.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum (4th Edition). Kencana Media Group, 2015.
Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Edisi 6, C. Liberty Yogyakarta, 2002.
Mohd Zin, Najibah, Noraini Md Hashim, Nora Abdul Hak, Roslina Che Soh, Ibrahim Kamaruddin, dan Mohd Helmi Md Said. “A Baseline Study of the Enforcement of Nafkah Orders in the Selangor Syariah Court.” Pertanika Journal of Social Science & Humanities 23, no. S (2015): 327–336.
Muhammad, Abdulkadir. Hukum Perdata Indonesia. Cetakan 5. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2014.
Nurjanah, Siti, Ahmad Syarifudin, Muhammad Mujib Baidhowi, Elva Mahmudi, dan Hidayat Darussalam. “Children’s Rights in Islamic Law: A Contemporary Study of Family Practices.” MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review 4, no. 2 (2025): 933–953. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v4i2.10077.
Onderhoudsbijdragen, Landelijk Bureau Inning. “LBIO het alimentatiebureau voor kinder- en partneralimentatie.” Preprint, Dutch Ministry of Justice and Security, 2025.
Purba, Adinda Maretsyah, dan Fauziah Lubis. “Hambatan dalam Pelaksanaan Putusan (Eksekusi) Perkara Perdata.” Jurnal Hukum dan Kebijakan Publik 6, no. 3 (2024): 209–21.
Putri, Viorizza Suciani, dan Yassine Chami. “Executing Hadhanah Decisions in Indonesia’s Religious Courts: Islamic Legal Principles, Child Welfare, and Multicultural Challenges.” Kawanua International Journal of Multicultural Studies 6, no. 2 (2025): 191–205. https://doi.org/10.30984/KIJMS.v6i2.1841.
Rahayu, Yunita Sri, dan Widiya Yul. “Problematics in the Implementation of Religious Court Decisions on the Execution of Child Support after Divorce.” JLPH: Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities 6, no. 2 (2025). https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i2.
State, U. S. Department of. “Passport Denial Program: Pay Child Support Before Applying for a Passport.” Preprint, Bureau of Consular Affairs, 2025.
Supaat, Joko, Moh. Muhibbin, dan Suratman. “Implementasi Putusan Hak Nafkah Istri Pasca Perceraian di Pengadilan Agama Pasuruan.” Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS) 8, no. 2 (2025): 942–52. https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v8i2.2908.
Sutantio, Retnowulan, dan Iskandar Oeripkartawinata. Hukum Acara Perdata dalam Teori dan Praktek. Mandar Maju, 2009.
Syarafuddin, Muhsan, Gioia Beatrice, Ghufran Jauhar, Ghifary Duyufur Rohman, dan Haris Maiza Putra. “Between Duty, Capacity, and Inability: Post-Divorce Child Support in Indonesian Religious Courts.” Indonesian Journal of Islamic Law 9, no. 1 (2026): 50–70. https://doi.org/10.35719/8sjf7s13.
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 (1945).
Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1989 tentang Peradilan Agama jo. UU No. 3/2006 jo. UU No. 50/2009. (1989).
Jalan Sorong - Klamono Km. 17 Klablim, Sorong - Papua Barat 
info@iainsorong.ac.id
