Konstruksi Pengetahuan dalam Perspektif Metodologi Program Riset Ilmiah Imre Lakatos

Authors

  • Theguh Saumantri IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47945/tasamuh.v14i2.680

Keywords:

Knowledge, Imre Lakatos, Research Program.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to describe imre Lakatos' analysis of the concept of The Methodology Scientific Research Program which contributes to the contextualization of contemporary knowledge and passes down the tradition of research to Islamic science. In philosophical discourse, knowledge is the consciousness of man in search of an objective truth. This research is a library research with a philosophical approach. The conclusions in this study explain that in imre lakatos thinking science is a series of interrelated theories that in its development always have a continuous character (continuity) The prototype of the Lakatos Research Program is an engineering program to obtain science consisting of negative heuristics and positive heuristics and the research program initiated by Lakatos is a formulation of the procession of scientific discoveries,  so it is hoped that the practice can be followed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah, M. Amin. “Preliminary Remarks On The Philosopy of Islamic Religious Science.” Al-Jami’ah Journal of Islamic Studies 36, no. 61 (1998).

Afandi. “Reinterpretasi Filsafat Sains Menurut Pandangan Karl Popper, Thomas Kunt Dan Imre Lakatos.” Prosiding SNPS (Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains) 1, no. 1 (2017).

Anton Bakker, Achmad Charris Zubair. Metodologi Penelitian Filsafat. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2005.

Assya’bani, Ridhatullah. “Methodology of Scientific Reseacrh Programmes Imre Lakatos: Implikasi Terhadap Studi Dan Pendidikan Islam.” AT-TURAS: Jurnal Studi Keislaman 7, no. 2 (December 31, 2020): 218–231. https://ejournal.unuja.ac.id/index.php/at-turas/article/view/1053.

Darmaji, Agus. Hubungan Filsafat Dan Ilmu: Tinjauan Sosiologis. Jakarta: Pantera Press, 2005.

Emzir. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2017.

Fitriana, Nurin. “Optimalisasi Pemahaman Fisika Pada Hukum Newton Dengan Inquiry - Heuristik Vee Berbantuan Alat Peraga.” JURNAL PENDIDIKAN SAINS (JPS) 8, no. 1 (May 5, 2020): 73. https://jurnal.unimus.ac.id/index.php/JPKIMIA/article/view/5364.

Frans Magnis Suseno. Filsafat Sebagai Ilmu Kritis. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2012.

Hardono Hadi. Epistemologi: Filsafat Pengetahuan. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, n.d.

Haryono, Dedi. “Gagasan Uji Teori Empiris Melalui Falsifikasi (Analisis Pemikiran Karl Popper Dalam Filsafat Ilmu).” Jurnal al- Ulum: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Penelitian ke-Islaman 1, no. 1 (2014): 73–78.

Hondrerich, Ten. The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.

Kesuma, Ulfa, and Ahmad Wahyu Hidayat. “Pemikiran Thomas S. Kuhn Teori Revolusi Paradigma.” Islamadina : Jurnal Pemikiran Islam (November 9, 2020): 166. http://jurnalnasional.ump.ac.id/index.php/ISLAMADINA/article/view/6043.

Mardiana Mardiana, Dewi Tumatul Ainin, Wahyu Iskandar. “Pemikiran Filsafat Kontemporer Imre Lakatos Terhadap Riset Pendidikan Dan Sains” 6, no. 1 (2022): 4355–4362.

Mosgrave, Imre Lakatos and Alan. Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. London: Cambridge University Press, 1975.

Muslih, Mohammad. “Filsafat Ilmu Imre Lakatos Dan Metodologi Pengembangan Sains Islam.” TASFIYAH; Jurnal Pemikiran Islam 4, no. 1 (2020).

Mustansyir, Rizal. “Program Riset Ilmiah Imre Lakatos.” Jurnal Filsafat 17, no. 3 (2007).

Nur, Emrinaldi. “Keilmiahan Positive Accounting Theory Dipandang Dari Tiga Main Stream Filsafat (Lakatos, Kuhn Dan Popper).” Universitas Riau, 2017.

Nur, M. “Revivalisasi Epistemologi Falsifikasi.” Jurnal Agama dan Hak Azazi Manusia In Right 2, no. 1 (2012): 1–14. http://ejournal.uin-suka.ac.id/syariah/inright/article/view/1230.

Saka Falwa Guna, Ahmad, and Fitria Ramadhani. “Metodologi Program Riset Imre Lakatos.” JURNAL PENDIDIKAN ISLAM AL-ILMI 4, no. 1 (May 11, 2021). http://lonsuit.unismuhluwuk.ac.id/index.php/ilmi/article/view/934.

Sholahudin, Umar. “Membedah Teori Kritis Mazhab Frankfurt : Sejarah, Asumsi, Dan Kontribusinya Terhadap Perkembangan Teori Ilmu Sosial.” Journal of Urban Sociology 3, no. 2 (October 31, 2020): 71. https://journal.uwks.ac.id/index.php/sosiologi/article/view/1246.

Subekti, Slamet. “Filsafat Ilmu Karl R. Popper Dan Thomas S. Kuhn Serta Implikasinya Dalam Pengajaran Ilmu.” HUMANIKA 22, no. 2 (December 1, 2015): 39. http://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/humanika/article/view/11737.

Sutrisno. Fazlur Rahman: Kajian Terhadap Metode Epistemologi Dan Sistem Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2006.

Tamtowi, Moh. “Urgensi Scientific Research Programme Imre Lakatos Bagi Pengembangan Studi Islam.” Substantia: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin 13, no. 1 (2011).

Taryadi, Alfon. Epistemologi Pemecah Masalah. Jakarta: Paramadina, 2010.

Trisnowati, Eli, Rifki Niza, and Ismiyatun F. “Analisis Kesetimbangan Benda Dengan Hukum I Newton.” SPEKTRA : Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Sains 3, no. 2 (October 10, 2017): 122. https://spektra.unsiq.ac.id/index.php/spek/article/view/30.

Verhaak, C. Filsafat Ilmu Pengetahuan: Telaah Atas Cara Kerja Ilmu-Ilmu. Jakarta: Gramedia, 2010.

Wahyu Iskandar, Nur Rohman, Muhammad Yusuf. “Kontribusi Pemikiran Imre Lakatos (1922-1974) Dalam Pendekatan Berbasis Saintifik Di Madrasah Ibtidaiyah.” Proceeding of International Conference on Islamic Education (ICIED) 4, no. 1 (2019).

Downloads

Published

2022-10-10

How to Cite

Saumantri, T. (2022). Konstruksi Pengetahuan dalam Perspektif Metodologi Program Riset Ilmiah Imre Lakatos. Tasamuh: Jurnal Studi Islam, 14(2), 269–286. https://doi.org/10.47945/tasamuh.v14i2.680