The Relationship between Academic Persistence and Student Achievement in Chemistry and Its Implications for Curriculum Development
Hubungan Kegigihan Akademik dengan Prestasi Mahasiswa Kimia dan Implikasinya terhadap Pengembangan Kurikulum
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47945/search.v4i2.2836Keywords:
Kegigihan Akademik, Prestasi Mahasiswa, Pengembangan Kurikulum, Academic Persistence, Student Achievement, Curriculum DevelopmentAbstract
Student achievement is an important indicator in assessing the quality of higher education, but this achievement still shows significant variation, indicating the influence of internal student factors. One non-cognitive factor suspected to play a role is academic persistence, namely the ability to maintain effort and consistency in achieving long-term goals. This study aims to analyze the relationship between academic persistence and student achievement and its implications for curriculum development. The study used a quantitative approach with a survey. Participants were 192 undergraduate students in Chemistry Education and Chemistry Science at Padang State University, selected using stratified random sampling. Data were collected using a Likert-scale questionnaire to measure academic persistence and documented GPA as an indicator of achievement. Data analysis included validity, reliability, and normality tests, as well as Pearson correlation and simple linear regression. The results showed that the instrument had good validity and high reliability, with a Cronbach's Alpha value of 0.784. The normality test indicated that the data were normally distributed (p = 0.071). The results of the correlation analysis indicate a strong and significant positive relationship between academic persistence and student achievement (r = 0.780; p < 0.05). The regression results show a coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.609, which means that academic persistence contributes 60.9% to the variation in student achievement. This finding indicates that the higher the academic persistence, the higher the student achievement. The implications of this study emphasize integrating non-cognitive character strengthening into curriculum development. This can be realized through Project-Based Learning, process-based assessment, lecturers as facilitators providing constructive feedback, and supporting programs such as growth mindset training, academic mentoring, and stress management to produce graduates who are academically strong and resilient.
References
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Credé, M., Tynan, M. C., & Harms, P. D. (2017). Much ado about grit: A meta-analytic synthesis of the grit literature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(3), 492–511. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000102
Datu, J. A. D., Valdez, J. P. M., & King, R. B. (2016). The successful life of gritty students. School Psychology Quarterly, 31(3), 428–439. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000167
Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087–1101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087
Duckworth, A. L., & Quinn, P. D. (2009). Development and validation of the Short Grit Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(2), 166–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890802634290
Eskreis-Winkler, L., Shulman, E., Beal, S., & Duckworth, A. L. (2014). The grit effect. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(21), 7379–7384.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis (8th ed.). Pearson.
Kamath, A., Poojari, S., & Varsha, K. (2025). Assessing the robustness of normality tests under varying skewness and kurtosis: A practical checklist for public health researchers. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 25, 206. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-025-02641-y
Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., & Buckley, J. A. (2006). What Matters to Student Success : A Review of the Literature Spearheading a Dialog on Student Success. July.
Lee, S., & Sohn, Y. W. (2017). Effects of grit on academic achievement and career-related attitudes of college students in Korea. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 45(10), 1629–1642. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.6400
Manik, A. C., Sutrisno, H., & Rivaldo, I. (2022). Pengujian Validitas dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Konsepsi Pembelajaran Kimia pada Masa Pandemi COVID-19 Menggunakan Pemodelan Rasch. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(3), 1561–1568.
Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079.
Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ performance. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 353–387.
Rivaldo, I., Sutrisno, H., & Manik, A. C. (2022). Development and validation of academic hardiness questionnaire in learning chemistry during COVID-19 pandemic using Rasch model. Studies in Educational Science and Technology.
Rizqiyah, F., & Sutrisno, H. (2023). The Relationship o Academic Grit and Chemistry Aspirations on Cognitive Chemistry Learning Outcomes. Journal of Chemical Education, 12(3), 45–56.
Schmidt, F. T. C., Fleckenstein, J., Jan Retelsdorf, Lauren Eskreis-Winkler, & Jens Möller. (2019). A German Validation and a Domain-Specific Approach to Grit. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000407
Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. (Vol. 22, Issue 1987). https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025117736740
Tipton, E. (2014). Stratified sampling using cluster analysis: A sample selection strategy for improved generalizations from experiments. Evaluation Review, 38(5), 439–460. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X13516324
Wolters, C. A., & Hussain, M. (2015). Investigating grit. Learning and Individual Differences, 39, 47–54.
York, T. T. (2015). Defining and measuring academic success. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 20(5).
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70.











