Publication Ethics

 The Journal of Quality Assurance in Islamic Education (JQAIE) is a peer-reviewed national journal available online and published twice a year. This statement describes the ethical behavior of all parties involved in publishing articles in this journal, including the author, Editor in Chief, Editorial, Reviewer, and publisher (Institut Agama Islam Negeri Sorong). This statement is based on COPE's Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication

Peer-reviewed publication of articles in the Journal of Quality Assurance in Islamic Education (JQAIE) is an essential part of developing a coherent and respected knowledge network. This directly reflects the quality of the authors' work and the institutions that support them. The articles reviewed to support and embody the scientific method. Therefore, it is essential to agree on a standard of ethical behavior expected of all parties involved in publishing actions: authors, journal editors, peer reviewers, publishers, and the public.

The Sorong State Islamic Institute as the publisher of the Journal of Quality Assurance in Islamic Education (JQAIE), takes its guardianship duties over all stages of publishing seriously, and we acknowledge ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint, or additional commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions.

Publication Decision

The editor of the Journal of Quality Assurance in Islamic Education (JQAIE) is responsible for deciding which articles to submit to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers should always encourage such decisions. Editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and are limited by the current legal requirements relating to defamation, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. Editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.


Editors and editorial staff may not disclose any information about submitted manuscripts to anyone other than authors, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisors, and appropriate publishers, as appropriate. Editors evaluate the manuscripts for their intellectual content regardless of the author's race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, nationality, or political philosophy.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished material disclosed in the submitted manuscript may not be used in the editor's own research without the author's written consent. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be confidential and not used for personal gain. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have a conflict of interest with a co-author or agency.

Reviewer's Duty

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer reviews assist editors in making editorial decisions, and editorial communication with authors can also assist authors in improving the paper.


Any selected referee who feels ineligible to review the research reported in the manuscript or who knows his quick review is impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.


Manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They may not be shown or discussed with others except as permitted by the editor.

Standard of Objectivity

Reviews must be carried out objectively. The personal criticism of the author is inaccurate. Reviewers must express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Source Acknowledgment

Reviewers should identify relevant published works that the authors have not cited. Any statement that the observation, derivation, or argument has been previously reported must be accompanied by an appropriate citation. The reviewer should also call the editor's attention if there is any substantial resemblance or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and other papers published with personal knowledge.

Reporting standards

The dedication report writer must present an accurate report of the work performed and an objective discussion of its significance. The underlying data must be represented accurately. Manuscripts should contain sufficient detail and references to allow others to replicate the work. Statements that are fraudulent or intentionally inaccurate are unethical and unacceptable behavior.

Originality and Plagiarism

Authors must ensure that they have written entirely original work and if authors have used the work and words of others that have been appropriately cited or cited.


Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Publication

An author should not generally publish a manuscript describing the same research in more than one journal or significant publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal at the same time is unethical and unacceptable publishing behavior.

Source Acknowledgment

Proper recognition of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have influenced the nature of the work being reported.


Authors of articles should be limited to those who have contributed significantly to the conception, design, implementation, or interpretation of the reported research. Everyone who has made a significant contribution must be registered as a co-author. Where other people have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they must be recognized or registered as contributors. The appropriate author shall ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included in the manuscript and that all co-authors have viewed and approved the final version of this paper and submitted it for publication.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author finds significant errors or inaccuracies in his published work, the author must immediately notify the journal editor or publisher and work with the editor to retract or correct the manuscript.