Analisis Akuisisi Kemampuan Kognitif dan Psikomotorik Peserta Didik Kelas III SD Nurul Sakinah Azzahra dalam Pembelajaran IPA pada Materi Ekosistem dan Rantai Makanan

Authors

  • rahmi zahirah Institut agama islam negeri sorong

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47945/misool.v1i1.2346

Keywords:

Science learning, contextual approach, descriptive qualitative, ecosystem, food chain, elementary education

Abstract

Science education at the elementary level plays a crucial role in fostering students’ scientific thinking skills and practical abilities. This study aims to explore and describe the development of cognitive and psychomotor competencies in science learning among third-grade students at SD Nurul Sakinah Azzahra, with a specific focus on the topic of ecosystems and food chains. A qualitative descriptive–exploratory design was employed to capture the learning experiences of 21 purposively selected participants. Data were collected through classroom observations, semi-structured interviews, and documentation, and analyzed using the Miles and Huberman interactive model, which consists of data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The findings indicate that contextual and experiential learning approaches significantly enhanced students’ understanding of ecological relationships and their ability to represent food chain concepts accurately. Students actively engaged in observing plants and animals within their school environment, classifying organisms into producers, consumers, and decomposers, and creating simple visual models of energy transfer. Cognitive growth was evident in students’ improved ability to explain interdependence among living organisms using logical reasoning, while psychomotor development was reflected through improved observation, recording, and drawing skills. The teacher’s role as a facilitator was central to encouraging exploration, collaboration, and inquiry-based learning. Although challenges such as limited time, instructional resources, and diverse student abilities were encountered, these were effectively managed through adaptive teaching strategies and contextualized learning activities. In conclusion, the study demonstrates that contextual and exploratory science instruction fosters not only conceptual understanding but also curiosity, creativity, and environmental awareness among young learners. These findings emphasize the importance of implementing active, student-centered learning approaches in elementary science education to promote holistic cognitive, psychomotor, and affective development.

References

Birt, L., Scott, S., Cavers, D., Campbell, C., & Walter, F. (2016). Member checking: A tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation? Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1802–1811. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316654870

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506335193

DiCicco-Bloom, B., & Crabtree, B. F. (2006). The qualitative research interview. Medical Education, 40(4), 314–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02418.x

Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

Fauzi, A., & Rahmatullah, R. (2021). Contextual learning approach in science education to enhance students’ conceptual understanding and environmental awareness. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 9(2), 112–121. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpsi.v9i2.38421

Fitriani, N., & Prasetyo, Z. K. (2018). Developing environmental awareness through science learning in elementary schools. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(3), 347–355. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i3.14422

Fitria, R., Santoso, A., & Marlina, D. (2019). Enhancing students’ conceptual understanding of ecosystems through inquiry-based science learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(4), 523–531. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i4.18342

Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs: Principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6 Pt 2), 2134–2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117

Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research (6th ed.). London: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529716641

Gentles, S. J., Charles, C., Ploeg, J., & McKibbon, K. A. (2015). Sampling in qualitative research: Insights from an overview of the methods literature. The Qualitative Report, 20(11), 1772–1789. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2015.2373

Handayani, T., & Mulyani, R. (2023). Experiential-based science learning in elementary schools: Strengthening meaningful learning through environmental exploration. International Journal of Elementary Education Research, 5(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.31002/ijeer.v5i1.4093

Handayani, T., & Prabowo, S. (2022). Experiential learning as a strategy to improve scientific process skills in elementary students. International Journal of Elementary Education, 6(2), 74–83. https://doi.org/10.31002/ijee.v6i2.39211

Kallio, H., Pietilä, A. M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954–2965. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13031

Kurniawan, D., & Rachmawati, R. (2020). The development of scientific attitudes through inquiry-based science learning in elementary schools. Journal of Primary Education Research, 9(2), 85–94. https://doi.org/10.31002/jper.v9i2.2874

Kusumawati, D., & Rahmatullah, R. (2020). Developing critical and evidence-based thinking through observation activities in science learning. Asian Journal of Science Education, 3(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.26858/ajse.v3i1.15541

Kusumawati, D., & Utami, W. (2021). Introducing ecosystem balance through elementary science learning: A qualitative study. Journal of Educational Science and Practice, 8(3), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.15294/jesp.v8i3.39211

Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753–1760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444

Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2016). Designing qualitative research (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452243640

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119410867

Nuraini, S., & Hidayat, M. (2021). Cognitive and psychomotor integration in science learning for primary students. Journal of Primary Science Education, 9(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpse.v9i1.29114

Orb, A., Eisenhauer, L., & Wynaden, D. (2001). Ethics in qualitative research. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(1), 93–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2001.00093.x

Opdenakker, R. (2006). Advantages and disadvantages of four interview techniques in qualitative research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 7(4), Art. 11. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-7.4.175

Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412972121

Pramono, H., Putri, R., & Ningsih, E. (2019). Teaching food chains and ecosystems through inquiry-based learning in elementary schools. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(1), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i1.15745

Rahma, D., & Yuliani, N. (2023). Observation-based science learning to develop elementary students’ process skills and curiosity. Journal of Research in Elementary Education, 11(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.29303/jree.v11i1.4024

Rahmawati, L., & Yusuf, M. (2022). Exploratory-descriptive research design in science education: Understanding student learning experiences qualitatively. Journal of Educational Research and Development, 10(2), 112–124. https://doi.org/10.31002/jerd.v10i2.4053

Rahmawati, L., Yuliani, E., & Wahyudi, D. (2022). Integrating environmental education into elementary science learning to promote ecological awareness. Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(1), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.29303/jes.v11i1.4021

Robinson, O. C. (2014). Sampling in interview-based qualitative research: A theoretical and practical guide. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 11(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2013.801543

Rohman, A., & Sulastri, N. (2020). Developing students’ psychomotor skills through hands-on activities in ecosystem learning. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 6(2), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.15294/j

Downloads

Published

2019-06-23

Issue

Section

Articles