REVIEWER

Al-Mumtaz: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam acknowledges the important contribution of peer reviewers to maintaining the scholarly quality, academic integrity, and relevance of published research. Reviewers provide independent expert assessments of submitted manuscripts, focusing on originality, theoretical contribution, methodological rigor, analytical quality, relevance to the journal's focus and scope, and the clarity of scholarly presentation.

The journal seeks to ensure that manuscript evaluation is conducted professionally, objectively, and confidentially. Reviewers are expected to disclose potential conflicts of interest, provide constructive and evidence-based recommendations, respect the confidentiality of submitted manuscripts, and uphold the principles of research integrity and publication ethics. Editorial decisions remain the responsibility of the journal's editorial team and are informed by the peer-review process and the journal's publication policies.

Reviewers and Affiliations

1 Dr. Muhammad Arsyam, M.Pd.

STAI DDI Kota Makassar
SINTA Profile (ID: 6709897) | Scopus Author Profile (ID: 58805844100)

2 Dr. Zakirah, M.HI.

UIN Alauddin Makassar
SINTA Profile (ID: 6731785) | Scopus Author Profile (ID: 58508381000)

3 Sulaeman Ali, M.A.

IAIN Bone
Google Scholar Profile

4 Dr. Syamsul Arifin, M.Pd.I.

Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Ahmad Sibawayhie
SINTA Profile (ID: 6817563)

5 Ibnu Chudzaifah, M.Pd.

Institut Agama Islam Negeri Sorong
SINTA Profile (ID: 6666011)

6 Dr. Paul Arjanto, S.Pd., M.Pd.

Universitas Patimura
SINTA Profile (ID: 5982370)

7 Dr. Yuliana A., M.Pd.

Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong
SINTA Profile (ID: 6173579)

8 Nurmaisyah, M.Pd.

Universitas Timika
SINTA Profile (ID: 6747205)

Peer Review Principles

The journal is committed to maintaining a responsible and transparent peer-review process. Reviewers are expected to assess manuscripts according to scholarly merit rather than the authors' personal characteristics, institutional affiliations, or other irrelevant considerations. Their recommendations should be supported by clear reasoning and constructive feedback that helps authors improve the quality of their work.

All reviewers are expected to maintain the confidentiality of manuscripts under review and to refrain from using unpublished information for personal or professional advantage. Any actual or potential conflict of interest should be disclosed to the editor. Reviewers who lack the appropriate expertise or are unable to complete an assessment within the agreed timeframe should inform the editorial team promptly.