MISOOL: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar welcomes original research articles, review papers, and scholarly contributions in the field of elementary education. Submitted manuscripts must not have been previously published or be under consideration elsewhere.

Manuscripts must be written in clear academic English and demonstrate originality, methodological rigor, and relevance.

The title is the first element readers encounter; therefore, it should clearly and concisely reflect the main focus of the study. A good title identifies the key variables, research object, methodology (if appropriate), and research context or location when relevant. It should be specific, informative, and attractive while avoiding unnecessary abbreviations, ambiguous terms, or overly complex wording. Most academic journals recommend titles between 10 and 20 words, depending on their author guidelines. An effective title improves the discoverability of the article in academic databases and search engines while enabling readers to quickly understand the scope and purpose of the research.

Full names, affiliations, and corresponding email

The abstract provides a concise summary of the entire research article in a single paragraph without citations. It should briefly describe the research background, the problem being addressed, the study objectives, the research methods, the participants or data sources, the main findings, and the primary conclusions. If appropriate, the abstract may also mention the practical or theoretical implications of the findings. Since the abstract is often the only part many readers initially access, it should accurately represent the entire study. Three to five relevant keywords should be included after the abstract to facilitate indexing and improve searchability.

The Keywords section contains three to five significant terms or phrases that accurately represent the main topics, concepts, variables, methods, or study context presented in the article. Keywords should be selected from the title, abstract, and core content of the manuscript to improve discoverability in academic databases and search engines. Authors should avoid repeating words already included in the journal title and should use standardized or widely accepted scientific terminology whenever possible. The keywords are typically arranged alphabetically or according to the journal's guidelines and separated by semicolons or commas. Well-chosen keywords enhance article indexing, retrieval, citation potential, and overall research visibility. 

The introduction explains the background of the study, identifies the research problem, and highlights its significance. It reviews relevant literature to establish the theoretical foundation and demonstrates the existing research gap that justifies conducting the study. This section should clearly explain the novelty or unique contribution of the research compared with previous studies. The introduction concludes by presenting the research objectives, research questions, and, where appropriate, the research hypotheses. A well-written introduction progresses logically from a broad discussion of the topic to the specific issue being investigated, allowing readers to understand the motivation and importance of the research.. 

The methods section describes how the research was conducted in sufficient detail to enable replication by other researchers. It should include the research design, study setting, research period, population and sample or data sources, sampling techniques, research instruments, data collection procedures, and variables if applicable. The section should also explain the statistical or qualitative data analysis techniques employed to answer the research questions. When human or animal participants are involved, ethical approval and informed consent procedures should be described where necessary. The methods should be presented systematically, clearly, and objectively to ensure transparency and scientific credibility. 

The results section presents the research findings objectively using text, tables, figures, or graphs without unnecessary interpretation. The discussion then explains the meaning and significance of these findings by relating them to existing theories and comparing them with previous research. Authors should explain possible reasons for the observed results, discuss their theoretical and practical implications, and highlight the study's contribution to knowledge. Any inconsistencies with earlier studies should be addressed through logical explanations. The discussion should demonstrate how the findings answer the research objectives while emphasizing the novelty and broader impact of the study within the relevant field

The discussion then explains the meaning and significance of these findings by relating them to existing theories and comparing them with previous research. Authors should explain possible reasons for the observed results, discuss their theoretical and practical implications, and highlight the study's contribution to knowledge. Any inconsistencies with earlier studies should be addressed through logical explanations. The discussion should demonstrate how the findings answer the research objectives while emphasizing the novelty and broader impact of the study within the relevant field.

The conclusion summarizes the main findings of the study and directly answers the research objectives or research questions. Rather than repeating the discussion, it highlights the most important outcomes and their significance. This section should explain the contribution of the research to theory, practice, or policy, depending on the nature of the study. Authors may also acknowledge the limitations of the research and provide recommendations for future studies to address those limitations or explore related topics. The conclusion should remain concise, evidence-based, and fully consistent with the findings presented throughout the article without introducing new information.

Acknowledgments section recognizes the individuals, institutions, and organizations that contributed to the successful completion of the research but do not meet the criteria for authorship. Authors should acknowledge financial support, research grants, institutional facilities, technical assistance, statistical consultation, language editing, or administrative support received during the study. This section may also express gratitude to research participants, collaborators, or field assistants whose contributions were valuable to the project. Any funding agency should be identified by its official name and, when applicable, the grant number. The acknowledgments should be concise, professional, relevant to the research, and free from personal or unrelated expressions of appreciation. . 

The references section lists all sources cited in the manuscript and should follow the citation style required by the target journal, such as APA, IEEE, Harvard, or Vancouver. Every in-text citation must correspond to a complete reference entry, and every listed reference must be cited within the text. Authors are encouraged to use recent, high-quality, and credible sources, including peer-reviewed journal articles, academic books, conference proceedings, and official publications. Reference management software such as Mendeley, Zotero, or EndNote is highly recommended to ensure citation consistency, minimize formatting errors, and simplify manuscript preparation according to journal requirements.

Length: 5,000–8,000 words Authors should prepare their manuscripts in accordance with the journal’s formatting requirements to ensure consistency, readability, and efficient peer review. The manuscript should be between 5,000 and 8,000 words, excluding references and supplementary materials unless otherwise specified. The entire document must be typed using Times New Roman, 12-point font, with 1.15 line spacing and 2.0 cm margins on all sides. All pages should be numbered consecutively, and section headings should follow a clear hierarchical structure. Tables and figures must be numbered sequentially, accompanied by descriptive titles and cited within the text. Authors are required to use the APA 7th Edition style for in-text citations, reference lists, headings, tables, figures, numbers, abbreviations, and other elements of scholarly writing to maintain academic consistency and integrity throughout the manuscript.

Follow APA 7th Edition.

Example: Author, A. A. (Year). Title. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), pages. https://doi.org/xxx

Numbered consecutively. Tables and figures should be included only when they effectively enhance the presentation and interpretation of research findings. All tables and figures must be numbered consecutively according to the order in which they are first mentioned in the text (e.g., Table 1, Figure 1) and must be explicitly cited within the manuscript. Each table and figure should have a clear, concise, and descriptive title that accurately reflects its content. Images, graphs, diagrams, and photographs must be submitted in high resolution to ensure clarity and readability in both online and printed publications. Authors should avoid duplicating the same information in both tables and figures, provide appropriate source acknowledgments when necessary, and format all tables and figures consistently in accordance with APA 7th Edition guidelines.

Authors must ensure that their research complies with the highest standards of academic integrity and research ethics throughout the entire study. Manuscripts should be original and free from plagiarism, data fabrication, falsification, and other forms of scientific misconduct. All ideas, data, quotations, and findings obtained from other sources must be properly cited in accordance with APA 7th Edition guidelines. Research involving human participants, animals, or sensitive data must obtain ethical approval from the appropriate institutional review board or ethics committee before data collection, and the approval details should be reported in the manuscript when applicable. Authors are also required to disclose any financial, professional, or personal conflicts of interest that could influence the research, ensuring transparency, credibility, and trust in the published work.

All submitted manuscripts are subject to plagiarism screening using Turnitin before entering the peer-review process. Authors are responsible for ensuring that their work is original and that all borrowed ideas, text, data, figures, and other materials are properly cited in accordance with APA 7th Edition guidelines. Manuscripts with a Turnitin Similarity Index exceeding 25% may be returned to the authors for revision or rejected, depending on the nature and extent of the overlap. The similarity assessment considers not only the overall percentage but also the quality and source of matched content. Any evidence of plagiarism, self-plagiarism, duplicate publication, data fabrication, or other forms of academic misconduct will result in editorial action, including immediate rejection, manuscript withdrawal, or additional sanctions in accordance with the journal’s publication ethics policy.

Authors must follow the official submission process established by the journal to ensure that manuscripts are submitted correctly and efficiently. The submission process begins with authors registering or logging into the Online Journal System (OJS) using valid account information. After completing registration, authors must upload the manuscript file according to the journal’s formatting requirements and submission guidelines. Authors are also required to complete and submit accurate metadata, including the manuscript title, author names, affiliations, abstract, keywords, and other relevant information. Before final submission, authors should carefully review all uploaded files and provided details to ensure accuracy and completeness. The submitted manuscript must represent original work, comply with ethical standards, and not be under review by another journal simultaneously. Any incomplete submission may delay the review process.

The MISOOL journal applies a double-blind peer review process to ensure fairness, objectivity, and academic integrity in evaluating submitted manuscripts. In this system, the identities of both authors and reviewers are concealed throughout the review process to minimize potential bias and maintain impartial assessment. Each manuscript is evaluated by qualified reviewers who examine the originality, scientific quality, methodology, accuracy of analysis, relevance, and contribution to the field. Based on reviewers’ comments and recommendations, manuscripts may be accepted, rejected, or returned to authors for revision. Authors are required to carefully respond to reviewer feedback and submit revised manuscripts within the specified timeframe. The final publication decision is determined by the editor based on the quality of the manuscript and the reviewers’ evaluations. .

The MISOOL journal operates under a no Article Processing Charges (APC) policy. Authors are not required to pay any fees for manuscript submission, peer review, editorial processing, or publication. All accepted articles are published free of charge. If authors wish to use the Fast Review Process service, an additional fee will be charged to improve the quality and efficiency of the review process conducted by the reviewers. For more information, please contact the Journal Editor through the WhatsApp channel: +62852-8448-8330..  

All articles published by the MISOOL journal are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which allows readers to access, share, reuse, adapt, and redistribute the published work, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original authors and the journal. Authors retain copyright ownership of their work while granting the journal the right to publish and disseminate the article. Any reuse, reproduction, or modification of the published content must include proper attribution and citation according to academic standards. The CC BY license supports open access publishing by promoting the wider dissemination of scientific knowledge while maintaining recognition of authorship and research contributions. Authors are responsible for ensuring that submitted manuscripts comply with copyright regulations and do not violate third-party rights.  .

The Data Availability Statement provides information regarding the accessibility and availability of the data supporting the findings of the research. Authors are encouraged to share research data to promote transparency, reproducibility, and further scientific development. This statement should indicate whether the datasets used or generated during the study are publicly available, stored in a recognized data repository, or accessible upon reasonable request from the corresponding author. If data cannot be shared due to ethical, privacy, confidentiality, or legal restrictions, authors should clearly explain the reasons. Any shared datasets should include appropriate documentation, metadata, and citations to ensure proper acknowledgment and responsible data use. A clear data availability statement strengthens research credibility and supports open science practices. .

Authors are responsible for maintaining the highest standards of academic integrity throughout the research and publication process. Authors must ensure that submitted manuscripts are original, free from plagiarism, and accurately represent the research methods, data, and findings. Authors are required to carefully review and revise manuscripts based on editorial decisions and reviewer comments to improve the quality and clarity of the work. They should provide constructive responses to reviewers’ suggestions and clearly explain any revisions or disagreements. Authors must also ensure that all information, data analysis, references, and conclusions presented in the manuscript are accurate, reliable, and supported by appropriate evidence before publication.

Authors should ensure that submitted manuscripts fully comply with the journal’s guidelines, including formatting requirements, ethical standards, submission procedures, and publication policies. Manuscripts that do not meet the required standards may be returned to authors for correction before proceeding to the review process. The editorial board reserves the right to make minor editorial adjustments, such as improving grammar, formatting, consistency, and clarity, without changing the scientific meaning or content of the manuscript. Authors remain responsible for the accuracy and integrity of the submitted work. Final decisions regarding acceptance, revision, or rejection are determined by the editorial board based on academic quality, relevance, and compliance with journal standards.