Computational Modeling and Video Analysis in Kinematics Learning: A Systematic Review of Tracker Software Use in Physics Laboratories

Authors

  • Hardiani Mardiah Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Wahyuni Bustani Institut Agama Islam Negeri Sorong

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47945/create.v1i1.3359

Keywords:

Tracker Software, Video Analysis, Computational Modeling, Kinematics, Misconceptions, Inquiry-Based Laboratory, Systematic Review

Abstract

Tracker, a free video analysis and modeling tool, is widely used in physics laboratories, yet it is unclear what the evidence shows about its effects on kinematics learning and how its video analysis and modeling functions are combined. This systematic review, reported with reference to PRISMA 2020, addressed two questions: (1) how Tracker-based learning designs are used to support conceptual understanding and address misconceptions in kinematics, and what outcomes are reported; and (2) how video analysis is integrated with computational modeling to improve laboratory experimental design. Peer-reviewed journal articles published between 2016 and 2026 were screened, appraised with the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, and synthesised thematically. Three of the eight studies listed in the initial draft did not meet the eligibility criteria, and one entry could not be verified. The working corpus comprised twelve studies: seven reporting learner outcomes and five reporting measurement validity or instructional design. Most studies were conducted in Indonesian secondary schools and used one-group or non-equivalent designs. Reported outcomes included gains in science process skills (N-gain = 0.53), graph interpretation (N-gain = 0.68), investigative skills, creative thinking (N-gain = 0.20), and critical thinking. Measurement studies showed that Tracker produced kinematic parameters consistent with theoretical values, such as g = 9.98 m/s². However, only one study examined conceptual understanding with a diagnostic approach, none used standardised instruments such as the Test of Understanding Graphs in Kinematics, and none explicitly reported using Tracker’s dynamic modeling feature. The claims that Tracker remediates misconceptions and that combining video analysis with modeling yields larger gains are therefore plausible, supported by earlier international studies, but not yet established by the 2016–2026 evidence. The review proposes a five-level framework for integrating video analysis and modeling, together with an inquiry-based laboratory design and a research agenda.

References

Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16(3), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.001

Alfayani, C., Suana, W., & Viyanti, V. (2024). Pengaruh pembelajaran blended learning menggunakan Tracker pada materi gerak harmonis sederhana berbasis inkuiri terbimbing terhadap peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa [Effect of blended learning using Tracker on guided-inquiry-based simple harmonic motion on students’ creative thinking skills]. JIPFRI (Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika dan Riset Ilmiah), 8(1), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.30599/jipfri.v8i1.3315

Amaliah, N. U., Darmadi, I. W., & Saehana, S. (2020). Analysis of students’ understanding of motion concept with video based learning assisted by Tracker software. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 8(2), 126–132. https://doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v8i2.8369

Artiningsih, A., & Nurohman, S. (2019). Analysis of investigative skills based on the use of tracker video analysis for 21th century skill. Journal of Science Education Research, 3(2), 81–86. https://doi.org/10.21831/jser.v3i2.30621

Becker, S., Klein, P., Gößling, A., & Kuhn, J. (2020a). Using mobile devices to enhance inquiry-based learning processes. Learning and Instruction, 69, Article 101350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101350

Becker, S., Klein, P., Gößling, A., & Kuhn, J. (2020b). Investigating dynamic visualizations of multiple representations using mobile video analysis in physics lessons: Effects on emotion, cognitive load and conceptual understanding. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 26(1), 123–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40573-020-00116-9

Beichner, R. J. (1994). Testing student interpretation of kinematics graphs. American Journal of Physics, 62(8), 750–762. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.17449

Beichner, R. J. (1996). The impact of video motion analysis on kinematics graph interpretation skills. American Journal of Physics, 64(10), 1272–1277. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18390

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806

Brown, D., & Cox, A. J. (2009). Innovative uses of video analysis. The Physics Teacher, 47(3), 145–150. https://pubs.aip.org/aapt/pte/article-abstract/47/3/145/275154/Innovative-Uses-of-Video-Analysis

Caballero, M. D., Kohlmyer, M. A., & Schatz, M. F. (2012). Implementing and assessing computational modeling in introductory mechanics. Physical Review Special Topics—Physics Education Research, 8(2), Article 020106. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.020106

Fitriyanto, I., & Sucahyo, I. (2016). Penerapan software Tracker video analyzer pada praktikum kinematika gerak [Application of Tracker video analyzer software in kinematics laboratory work]. Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 5(3). https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/inovasi-pendidikan-fisika/article/view/19949

Gusenbauer, M., & Haddaway, N. R. (2020). Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Research Synthesis Methods, 11(2), 181–217. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1378

Habibbulloh, M., & Madlazim, M. (2014). Penerapan metode analisis video software Tracker dalam pembelajaran fisika konsep gerak jatuh bebas untuk meningkatkan keterampilan proses siswa kelas X SMAN 1 Sooko Mojokerto [Application of the Tracker video analysis method in physics learning of the free-fall concept to improve the process skills of grade X students at SMAN 1 Sooko Mojokerto]. Jurnal Penelitian Fisika dan Aplikasinya (JPFA), 4(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpfa.v4n1.p15-22

Handayani, I. D., Ahmad, F., & Aryati P. L., D. (2022). Efektivitas Tracker video analysis dalam praktikum fisika untuk menentukan percepatan gravitasi [Effectiveness of Tracker video analysis in physics laboratory work for determining gravitational acceleration]. ORBITA: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Fisika, 8(2), 328–332. https://doi.org/10.31764/orbita.v8i2.10766

Handayani, I. D., Lestari, D. A. P., & Sulistyowati, S. (2023). Analisis konstanta pegas dan percepatan gravitasi ayunan sederhana dengan Tracker video analysis untuk meningkatkan computational thinking [Analysis of the spring constant and gravitational acceleration of a simple pendulum using Tracker video analysis to improve computational thinking]. ORBITA: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Fisika, 9(1), 155–161. https://doi.org/10.31764/orbita.v9i1.13671

Hestenes, D. (1987). Toward a modeling theory of physics instruction. American Journal of Physics, 55(5), 440–454. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.15129

Hockicko, P., Trpišová, B., & Ondruš, J. (2014). Correcting students’ misconceptions about automobile braking distances and video analysis using interactive program Tracker. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(6), 763–776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9510-z

Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10106

Hong, Q. N., Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., Dagenais, P., Gagnon, M.-P., Griffiths, F., Nicolau, B., O’Cathain, A., Rousseau, M.-C., Vedel, I., & Pluye, P. (2018). The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Education for Information, 34(4), 285–291. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-180221

Lazonder, A. W., & Harmsen, R. (2016). Meta-analysis of inquiry-based learning: Effects of guidance. Review of Educational Research, 86(3), 681–718. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315627366

McDermott, L. C., Rosenquist, M. L., & van Zee, E. H. (1987). Student difficulties in connecting graphs and physics: Examples from kinematics. American Journal of Physics, 55(6), 503–513. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.15104

Nisa, M. K., Kurniawan, W., & Nuroso, H. (2024). Tren penggunaan software Tracker dalam fisika: Systematic-review [Trends in the use of Tracker software in physics: A systematic review]. Lontar Physics Today, 3(3), 120–129. https://doi.org/10.26877/lpt.v3i3.21878

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, Article n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003

Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730660207

Purnama, A. Y., Istiyono, E., Ariswan, A., & Nurhanafi, K. (2026). Simulation of the use of analysis video tracker software in kinematics material as an alternative distance learning. Revista Mexicana de Física E, 23(2), Article 020204. https://doi.org/10.31349/RevMexFisE.23.020204

Putri, A. S., & Agustina, R. R. (2023). Enhancing physics learning through virtual experiments: Analyzing parabolic motion and maximum height using Tracker software. ISEJ: Indonesian Science Education Journal, 4(3), 86–94. https://doi.org/10.62159/isej.v4i3.1756

Raflesiana, V., Herlina, K., & Wahyudi, I. (2019). Pengaruh penggunaan Tracker pada pembelajaran gerak harmonik sederhana berbasis inkuiri terbimbing terhadap keterampilan interpretasi grafik siswa [Effect of using Tracker in guided-inquiry learning of simple harmonic motion on students’ graph interpretation skills]. Gravity: Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.30870/gravity.v5i1.5207

Rahmadani, U., Sundari, P. D., Hidayati, H., & Dewi, W. S. (2023). Systematic review of misconceptions in kinematics: Identification, causes, and remediation. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(12), 1274–1283. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i12.4956

Renika, J., Prima, E. C., & Amprasto, A. (2024). Kinematics analysis on accelerated motion using tracker video analysis for educational purposes. Momentum: Physics Education Journal, 8(1), 23–31. https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v8i1.8883

Romadhon, D. R., Muslim, M. A. B., & Suwarna, I. P. (2024). Video-based laboratories in physics: A quasi-experimental study on rotational dynamics and critical thinking enhancement. Jurnal Pijar MIPA, 19(4), 732–737. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v19i4.7266

Sariyah, Kuswanto, H., Nurcahyo, H., Ilma, A. Z., & Hujatulatif, A. (2022). Hamster (Cricetinae) motion assisted by video tracker application on motion materials in junior high school. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(6). https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i6.1583

Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 261–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5

Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, Article 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45

Thornton, R. K., & Sokoloff, D. R. (1990). Learning motion concepts using real-time microcomputer-based laboratory tools. American Journal of Physics, 58(9), 858–867. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.16350

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press. https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674576292

Wee, L. K., Chew, C., Goh, G. H., Tan, S., & Lee, T. L. (2012). Using Tracker as a pedagogical tool for understanding projectile motion. Physics Education, 47(4), 448–455. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/47/4/448

Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M., Orton, K., Jona, K., Trouille, L., & Wilensky, U. (2016). Defining computational thinking for mathematics and science classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(1), 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9581-5

Zaina, A., Al Farizi, Z., & Nurfadilah. (2026). The effectiveness of video tracker use in STEM-based linear motion learning to improve students’ critical thinking skills. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika, 17(1), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.26877/jp2f.v17i1.2323

Downloads

Published

2026-05-25

How to Cite

Mardiah, H., & Bustani, W. (2026). Computational Modeling and Video Analysis in Kinematics Learning: A Systematic Review of Tracker Software Use in Physics Laboratories. CREATE: Contemporary Research in Education and Teaching, 1(1), 58–68. https://doi.org/10.47945/create.v1i1.3359